* Hannu Krosing (ha...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > If you earlier used views for granting limited read access to some views > you definitely did not want view users suddenly gain also write access to > underlying table. > > You also probably did not GRANT only SELECT to your views as this was > the default anyway,
I'm not really convinced that we should be catering to this argument of "well, I knew it was gonna end up being read-only anyway, so I just GRANT'd ALL"- consider that rules can make view writable, even in existing releases. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature