On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:30:54AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Noah, > > > Attached patch just restores the old behavior. Would it be worth preserving > > the ability to fix an index consistency problem with a REINDEX independent > > from related heap consistency problems such as duplicate keys? > > I would love to have two versions of REINDEX, one which validated and > one which didn't. Maybe a ( validate off ) type check? > +1 There are reasons to reindex that do not involve its validity and it would be great to not need to visit the heap for that.
Regards, Ken -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
