On 07/05/2013 10:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Yeah, it would be good to revive this thread now, which is the > beginning of the development cycle. As of now, just to recall > everybody, an agreement on this patch still needs to be found... Simon > is concerned with backward compatibility. Greg presented a nice spec > some time ago (Robert and I liked it) which would break backward > compatibility but allow to begin with a fresh infrastructure.
As folks know, I favor Smith's approach. However, as far as I can find, GSmith never posted a patch for his version. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
