On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Well, Tom opined in > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/23249.1370878...@sss.pgh.pa.us that > the current patch is okay. I have a mild opinion that it should instead > print only SHR_LOCK when both bits are set, and one of the others when > only one of them is set. But I don't have a strong opinion about this, > and since Tom disagrees with me, feel free to exercise your own (Jeff's) > judgement.
I'm inclined to agree with you here, but I suppose it isn't all that important. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
