On 06/23/2013 09:43 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > (Cc: to pgsql-performance dropped, pgsql-hackers added.) > > At 2013-05-06 09:14:01 +0100, si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: >> >> New version of patch attached which fixes a few bugs. > > I read the patch, but only skimmed the earlier discussion about it. In > isolation, I can say that the patch applies cleanly and looks sensible > for what it does (i.e., cache pgprocno to speed up repeated calls to > TransactionIdIsInProgress(somexid)). > > In that sense, it's ready for committer, but I don't know if there's a > better/more complete/etc. way to address the original problem.
Has this patch had performance testing? Because of the list crossover I don't have any information on that. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
