On Friday, July 5, 2013, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 7/3/13 7:15 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > > I'm not comfortable with having all of the transform mappings in the > > main contrib/ directory though. Can we add a subdirectory called > > "transforms" containing all of these? > > I don't see any value in that. The data types they apply to are in > contrib after all. > > I guess his suggestion is contrib/transforms directory, not transforms directory at top level. Stil you don't see value?
-- Hitoshi Harada