On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 11:42 AM Simon Riggs wrote: On 22 June 2013 05:17, Amit kapila <amit.kap...@huawei.com> wrote: On Friday, June 21, 2013 11:48 PM Robert Haas wrote: On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kap...@huawei.com> wrote: >>>> Auto.conf - 1 Vote (Josh) >>>> System.auto.conf - 1 Vote (Josh) >>>> Postgresql.auto.conf - 2 Votes (Zoltan, Amit) >>>> Persistent.auto.conf - 0 Vote >>>> generated_by_server.conf - 1 Vote (Peter E) >>>> System.conf - 1 Vote (Magnus) >>>> alter_system.conf - 1 Vote (Alvaro) > >>>> I had consolidated the list, so that it would be helpful for committer to >>>> decide among proposed names for this file.
>>> I'll also vote for postgresql.auto.conf. >> Thanks to all of you for suggesting meaningful names. I will change the name of file to postgresql.auto.conf. >> Kindly let me know if there is any objection to it. > postgresql.auto.conf is similar enough to postgresql.conf that it will prevent tab completion from working as it does now. As a result it will cause > people to bring that file up for editing when we wish to avoid that. This new file postgresql.auto.conf will be created inside a new directory "config", so both will be in different directories. Will there be any confusion with tab completion for different directories? > So for me the name is not arbitrary because of that point and we should avoid the current choice. > Can we go for auto.postgresql.conf instead .... almost identical, just significantly visually different and not interfering with tab completion? With Regards, Amit Kapila. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
