On 28 June 2013 22:14, Steve Singer <st...@ssinger.info> wrote: > > I think the value is more important than the name, I want to the tests to > make sure that the conversion is actually converting properly. With your > method of getting the class name without the module we can have both. > > The attached patch should print the value and the class name but not the > module name. > > Steve >
Hi Steve, I agree, we can check both. This is quite a nice patch now, I've reviewed it, all tests pass, works as expected. I think it is ready for committing. thanks, Szymon
