On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 6/12/13 10:55 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> But it's got to be pretty common to archive to a local >> path that happens to be a remote mount, or to a local directory whose >> contents are subsequently copied off by a batch job. Making that work >> nicely with near-zero configuration would be a significant advance. > > Doesn't that just move the problem to managing NFS or batch jobs? Do we > want to encourage that? > > I suspect that there are actually only about 5 or 6 common ways to do > archiving (say, local, NFS, scp, rsync, S3, ...). There's no reason why > we can't fully specify and/or script what to do in each of these cases.
Go for it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
