* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Recently we had a gripe about how you can't read very many files > concurrently with contrib/file_fdw: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/of419b5767.8a3c9adb-on85257b79.005491e9-85257b79.0054f...@isn.rtss.qc.ca
Ouch, that's pretty bad.
> Barring objections or better ideas, I'd like to back-patch this as far
> as 9.1 where file_fdw was introduced.
+1. This would bump the limit to something like 300 instead of 10,
right? That seems pretty reasonable.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
