Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> writes:
>>> If we were a little earlier in the release cycle I would argue that >>> if we're going to do anything with this column we should drop it. > >> Which is exactly what I think we should do as soon as we branch. > > If we're going to do that, there doesn't seem to me to be a lot of point > in adjusting the column's contents in 9.3 --- the argument for doing > that was mostly forward compatibility with some future actual usage of > the column. I'd be more inclined to leave HEAD as-is and then do the > column-ectomy along with this removal of dead code in 9.4. ok -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
