"Fred&Dani&Pandora&Aquiles" <f...@nti.ufop.br> writes:
> I asked a while ago in this group about the possibility to implement a
> parallel planner in a multithread way, and the replies were that the
> proposed approach couldn't be implemented, because the postgres is not
> thread-safe. With the new feature Background Worker Processes, such
> implementation would be possible?
I don't think that bgworkers as currently implemented make this any more
practical than it was before. The communication overhead with a
separate process would swamp any benefit in most cases.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
