On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kap...@huawei.com> wrote: > On Monday, May 27, 2013 4:17 PM Amit Kapila wrote: >> On Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:55 AM Amit Kapila wote: >> > On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 9:49 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> > > There are 2 options to proceed for this patch for 9.4 > > 1. Upload the SET PERSISTENT syntax patch for coming CF by fixing existing > review comments > 2. Implement new syntax ALTER SYSTEM as proposed in below mail > > Could you suggest me what could be best way to proceed for this patch?
I'm still in favor of some syntax involving ALTER, because it's still true that this behaves more like the existing GUC-setting commands that use ALTER (which change configuration for future sessions) rather the ones that use SET (which change the current settings for some period of time). But I can't speak for people who are not me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
