On 31 May 2013 02:52, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > Testing 9.3beta, it seems that array_remove() may return an empty 1-d > array whose upper bound is lower than its lower bound. I know that we > discussed allowing this kind of array, but I don't think that > discussion reached any conclusion, other than to agree that the > current empty 0-d array behaviour would be kept in 9.3. >
That's right, zero-D is still the only supported representation of an empty array, so when array_remove() yields an empty array it ought to be zero-D. Good catch. Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
