> If we have reason to vacuum the relation we do it at > vacuum_freeze_table_age, not only at autovacuum_max_freeze_age. The > difference is that the latter triggers a vacuum, while the former only > changes a partial vacuum into a full one. > > Calling that behaviour unconditionally worse is, err, interesting...
*overall* it's better. But as far as FREEZE itself is concerned, it's worse. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
