>We may still be able to do better than what we're doing > today, but I'm still suspicious that you're going to run into other > issues with having 500 indexes on a table anyway.
+1. I am suspicious that the large number of indexes is the problem here,even if the problem is not with book keeping associated with those indexes. Regards, Atri -- Regards, Atri l'apprenant -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
