Josh Berkus wrote: > On 05/15/2013 10:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Uhm. If I've been anything wrt the 9.3 schedule, happy is not it. We > > completely failed to manage it in any kind of sane way. I vote +1 for > > keeping the same commitfest schedule this year, but please let's do > > everyone a favor and make sure we get some more (stricter?) management > > of the commitfests this time. Not closing the November commitfest in > > March would be appreciated, I think. > > Well, we could actually *follow* the schedule we outlined at the > Developer Meeting last year, including the triage periods. > > I'll also say: > * we need to assign CF managers at least 2 weeks in advance of each CF * > we need to replace them if they get too busy to follow-through, > * and the last CF needs two managers.
Obviously we need a meta-manager who makes sure we have managers, and is able to notice that a manager is MIA and needs replaced (or at least backed-up). -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers