* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > I still think we should revert 9db7ccae2000524b72a4052352cbb5407fb53b02. > The argument that the system-provided program might be faster carries > very little weight for me --- "make install" is fast enough already. > It's not worth making a bunch of extension authors jump through hoops, > whether their style was bad or not.
+1.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
