As for the cost, if the proposed tests are indeed too costly, what is not
necessarily the case for what I have seen, I do not think that it would be a
great problem to have two set of tests, with one a superset of the other,
with some convention.
Well, tests like permission tests aren't the expensive part. The actual
CREATE/DROP DATABASE you
Not me, but "Robins Tharakan".
do is. The latter essentially are already tested by the buildfarm
already.
Yep, that is what Tom was arguing.
So, trimming the patch to do only the fast stuff should be less
controversial?
Yes, I think so.
I think that allowing "expensive" tests such as a full archive or
replication setup would be nice as well, so maybe having several level of
tests would be a good thing anyway.
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
