Karol Trzcionka <karl...@gmail.com> writes:
> as a continuation of my proposal expanding RETURNING syntax by
> AFTER/BEFORE, there can be enough time to implement RETURNING for COPY.
No there isn't; what you suggest would require FE/BE protocol
extensions, making it several orders of magnitude more work than the
other thing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
