On Monday, May 06, 2013 8:17 PM Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 12:43:55PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Sunday, April 21, 2013 10:32 AM Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I am not sure if Tom shared yet, but we are planning to package 9.3 > > > beta1 on April 29, with a release on May 2. Those dates might > change, > > > but that is the current plan. I have completed a draft 9.3 release > > > notes, which you can view here: > > > > > > http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-3.html > > > > > > I will be working on polishing them for the next ten days, so any > > > feedback, patches, or commits are welcome. I still need to add > lots of > > > SGML markup. > > > > 1. > > .Add wal_receiver_timeout parameter to control the WAL receiver > timeout > > (Amit Kapila) > > This allows more rapid detection of connection failure. No longer set > > wal_receiver_status_interval? > > > > I don't think we need to mention anything about > > wal_receiver_status_interval. > > OK, removed.
Thanks. > > 2. I am not able to figure out which item of release notes cover the > below > > feature commit > > Avoid inserting Result nodes that only compute identity projections. > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1UGCBh-0006P3- > a...@gemulon.postgresql.org > > I did not think that warranted a mention in the release notes. Was I > wrong? This was a performance improvement for a quite usable scenario, so I thought it would be useful for users to know about it. Performance data for simple cases I have posted: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/007e01ce08ff$dc0a2c60$941e8520$@kapila@ huawei.com With Regards, Amit Kapila. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
