On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 09:31:03AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Actually, there is - I hear it quite often from people not so > experienced in PostgreSQL. Though in fairness, I'm not entirely sure > the new syntax would help - some of those need a tool to do it for > them, really (and such tools exist, I believe). > > That said, there is one property that's very unclear now and that's > that you can only set one of recovery_target_time, recovery_target_xid > and recovery_target_name. But they can be freely combined with > recovery_target_timeline and recovery_target_inclusive. That's quite > confusing. > > > > > This changes the existing API which will confuse people that know it > > and invalidate everything written in software and on wikis as to how > > to do it. That means all the "in case of fire break glass" > > instructions are all wrong and need to be rewritten and retested. > > Yes, *that* is the main reason *not* to make the change. It has a > pretty bad cost in backwards compatibility loss. There is a gain, but > I don't think it outweighs the cost.
So, is there a way to add this feature without breaking the API? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
