On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 22:24, Joe Conway wrote:
> Well a "real" fix sounded like a lot of work, and no one had the right
> combination of time/desire/knowledge/skill to go implement it. The
> "workaround" fix was discussed in this more recent thread:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-08/msg01233.php
>
> It still isn't clear to me exactly what needs to be done to implement
> the workaround, and since I don't really *need* dates before 1970 for my
> own purposes (presently at least), I haven't tried to figure it out in
> favor of other priorities.
Thanks, that's informative. I don't really understand the workaround
either...
> But I'm sure a fix would be enthusiastically greeted on the PATCHES list ;-)
Probably not if I hacked away at it...at "Beta - 1" =:-o
G.
--
"Far and away the best prize that life has to offer
is the chance to work hard at work worth doing."
-- Theodore Roosevelt
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
