Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > On 04/23/2013 07:53 PM, Timothy Garnett wrote: >> Anyways, the question is if people think this is generally useful. If so >> I can clean up the preferred choice a bit and rebase it off of master, >> etc.
I find this idea very useful yes. Another idea would be to allow for parallel pg_dump output to somehow be piped into a parallel pg_restore. I don't know how to solve that at all, it just sound something worthy of doing too. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
