Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > The hunk that changes the messages might need some thought so that it > doesn't cause a translation regression. But in general I see no > reason not to do this before we release beta1. It seems safe enough, > and changes that reduce the need for packagers to carry private > patches are, I think, generally a good thing.
It looks to me like this is asking for pg_regress to adopt a nonstandard interpretation of PGHOST, which doesn't seem like a wise thing at all, especially if it's not documented. FWIW, the equivalent thing in the Red Hat/Fedora packages can be seen in this patch: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/postgresql.git/plain/postgresql-var-run-socket.patch which would not get noticeably shorter if we hacked pg_regress in the suggested way. AFAICT, instead of touching pg_regress.c, Red Hat's patch would need to do something to the regression Makefiles if we wanted to use this implementation. I'm not convinced that'd be better at all. TBH, if this is committed, the Red Hat patches will probably end up reverting it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
