John Gray wrote: > Please correct me if I've got this wrong, but it appears from the SRF > API, that a SRF cannot readily refer to the TupleDesc to which it is > expected to conform (i.e. the TupleDesc derived from the FROM clause of > an original SELECT statement) because that is held in the executor state > and not copied or linked into the function context. >
[snip] > > Does this sound completely crazy? > Not crazy at all. I asked the same question a few days ago: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-08/msg01914.php Tom suggested a workaround for my purpose, but I do agree that this is needed in the long run. I looked at it briefly, but there was no easy answer I could spot. I'll take another look today. Joe ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
