On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > >> >> How does the attached version look? I verified that it survives >> recovery, but not more. >> >> Jeff, any chance you can run this for a round with your suite? > > > > I've run it for a while now and have found no problems. >
fwiw, i have run installcheck (serial and parallel) and isolationtest, also combination of those (one installcheck, one isolationtest) at the same time while executing vacuum full, reindex database and manual checkpoint... i also check that the bgwriter was doing some work. i did all of this in a master node in a cluster with a standby and a cascade standby that were later promoted... and i have no problem with checksums at all, so i would say that the combination of Jeff's and Andres' patches fixed the problems we have seen until now -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación Phone: +593 4 5107566 Cell: +593 987171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
