On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 10:37 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> Over 10,000 cycles of crash and recovery, I encountered two cases of
> checksum failures after recovery, example:
>
>
> 14264 SELECT 2013-03-28 13:08:38.980 PDT:WARNING: page verification
> failed, calculated checksum 7017 but expected 1098
> 14264 SELECT 2013-03-28 13:08:38.980 PDT:ERROR: invalid page in block
> 77 of relation base/16384/2088965
>
> 14264 SELECT 2013-03-28 13:08:38.980 PDT:STATEMENT: select sum(count)
> from foo
It would be nice to know whether that's an index or a heap page.
>
> In both cases, the bad block (77 in this case) is the same block that
> was intentionally partially-written during the "crash". However, that
> block should have been restored from the WAL FPW, so its fragmented
> nature should not have been present in order to be detected. Any idea
> what is going on?
Not right now. My primary suspect is what's going on in
visibilitymap_set() and heap_xlog_visible(), which is more complex than
some of the other code. That would require some VACUUM activity, which
isn't in your workload -- do you think autovacuum may kick in sometimes?
Thank you for testing! I will try to reproduce it, as well.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
