On Mar 25, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: > On 03/14/2013 05:23 PM, Joe Conway wrote: >> On 03/13/2013 04:16 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: >>> Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes: >>>> I think it should dump the user data portion, especially since that >>>> matches what pg_dump would do if you did not specify the table or schema. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> If you don't have time slots to fix that by then, I will have a look at >>> fixing that while in beta. >> >> Here is a patch against 9.1. If there is agreement with the approach >> I'll redo for 9.2 and git head and apply. > > Any objections before I commit this? > > Since, nobody has picked this one.
If there is no objection,then I can test this patch against 9.1 & 9.2. Thanks & Regards, Vibhor Kumar EnterpriseDB Corporation The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company Blog:http://vibhork.blogspot.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
