> > I'll have to take a look. Removing *all spinning* from from page > allocation though feels like it might be worthwhile to test (got to > give some bonus points for being a very local change and simple to > implement). I wonder if with more shared buffers you tend to sweep > more buffers per allocation. (IIRC Jeff J was skeptical of that).
Replacing the spinning with TAS for buffer header sounds like a good idea. Regards, Atri -- Regards, Atri l'apprenant -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
