On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is fine with me, too, and I agree that it's warranted... but your > commit message supposes that this behavior is new in 9.3, and I think > it dates to 9.2.
No, it doesn't. It just missed the deadline for 9.2. I'm happy enough to have the setting be PGC_SUSET, since that more or less conveys that commit_delay isn't something that is sensible to set dynamically. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
