On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> BTW, it strikes me that dblink is probably subject to at least some of
> these same failure modes.  I'm not personally volunteering to fix any
> of this in dblink, but maybe someone ought to look into that.

I will try to make time for this, although it seems like the general
approach should match pgsql_fdw if possible.  Is the current thinking
to forward the settings and then use the GUC hooks to track updates?

--
fdr


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to