On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Why do you want to temporarily mark it as valid? I don't see any > requirement that it is set to that during validate_index() (which imo is > badly named, but...). > I'd just set it to valid in the same transaction that does the swap.
+1. I cannot realize yet why isprimary flag needs to be set even in the invalid index. In current patch, we can easily get into the inconsistent situation, i.e., a table having more than one primary key indexes. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
