On 3 March 2013 18:24, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The 16-bit checksum feature seems functional, with two sources of overhead. > There's some CPU time burned to compute checksums when pages enter the > system. And there's extra overhead for WAL logging hint bits. I'll > quantify both of those better in another message.
It's crunch time. Do you and Jeff believe this patch should be committed to Postgres core? Are there objectors? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
