On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 03/04/2013 01:42 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > > This patch only adds one more operator to already committed new > > opclass. Tests already cover this case. Without patch corresponding > > test leads to sequential scan instead of index scan. However, I can't > > see any documentation changes about already committed opclass. I think > > we need a documentation update as an separate patch. > > Jeff changes only does comments changes and renaming, I don't need to > > examine them more. > > OK. Would it be fair to summarize that as "I think it's ready to commit > as-is" ? Do you have any outstanding concerns or uncertainties? Yes. I think it's ready to commit as-is. ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.
