On 02/24/2013 09:58 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Adding a cast to json for a builtin type will have no effect unless > you also change this code. We can relax that but my view was that we > should know how to generate JSON from builtin types and just do it. If json generation from built-in types is complete with full coverage of all useful types when this first ships, then I'm happy. I was only concerned about the BC argument "you can't add a proper json-aware cast from interval to json because we've already been doing it via a cast to text and changing the result would break existing code".
That's all I'm worried about, and if that won't be an issue then I'm perfectly happy. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers