> That I could probably do. Do you think they should have a separate > pg_stat_user_matviews table, etc., or do you think it would be > better to include them in with tables there?
Well, ideally pg_matviews would have matview definitions, and pg_stat_matviews would have stats on matview usage and rows. But see what you can get done; I imagine we'll overhaul it for 9.4 anyway once we've had a chance to use the feature. > >> Also a \dM. > > I already added it as \dm in the current patch. Does that conflict > with something else that's pending? Oh, no, I thought \dm was *already* in use, but apparently not. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
