Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghega...@gmail.com> schrieb:

>On 17 February 2013 18:52, anara...@anarazel.de <and...@anarazel.de>
>wrote:
>> You already need a suppression file to use valgrind sensibly, its
>easy enough to add it there. Perhaps we should add one to the tree?
>
>Perhaps you should take the time to submit a proper Valgrind patch
>first. The current approach of applying the patch that Noah Misch
>originally wrote (but did not publicly submit, iirc) on an ad-hoc
>basis isn't great. That is what you've done here, right?

What patch are you talking about? I have no knowledge about any pending 
valgrind patches except one I made upstream apply to make pg inside valgrind 
work on amd64.

Andres

--- 
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to