Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghega...@gmail.com> schrieb:
>On 17 February 2013 18:52, anara...@anarazel.de <and...@anarazel.de> >wrote: >> You already need a suppression file to use valgrind sensibly, its >easy enough to add it there. Perhaps we should add one to the tree? > >Perhaps you should take the time to submit a proper Valgrind patch >first. The current approach of applying the patch that Noah Misch >originally wrote (but did not publicly submit, iirc) on an ad-hoc >basis isn't great. That is what you've done here, right? What patch are you talking about? I have no knowledge about any pending valgrind patches except one I made upstream apply to make pg inside valgrind work on amd64. Andres --- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers