Can someone explain where we are on this? Is it a TODO item?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Would it be useful to implement the SET SCHEMA command from SQL92? (I > > assume it's also in 99.) > > > > I guess that SET SCHEMA should change the front of the search path, so > > that it would change the schema reported by current_schema(). It would > > be a simplified form of SET SEARCH_PATH. > > Hrm - it would be sort of silly to launch an all-new standards-compliant > schema support without it? > > Chris > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
