2013-01-31 22:12 keltezéssel, Zoltán Böszörményi írta:
2013-01-31 19:38 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Zolt=E1n_B=F6sz=F6rm=E9nyi?= <z...@cybertec.at> writes:
Thanks. A question though: how does "make check" or "make installcheck"
chooses between the *.out and its different *_N.out incarnations?
I couldn't find traces of prepared_xacts_1.out in any file saying "this
is the one to be used in this-and-this" configuration. Does the procedure
check against all versions and the least different one is reported?
Exactly.  This is documented, see the "regression tests" chapter of the
SGML manual.

            regards, tom lane

Thanks.

I tested my patch with installcheck and installcheck-parallel
using max_prepared_transactions=0 in the server and
it passed that way too.

# ping -c 3 craig.ringer
PING craig.ringer (192.168.1.80) 56(84) bytes of data.
From craig.ringer (192.168.1.80) icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
From craig.ringer (192.168.1.80) icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
From craig.ringer (192.168.1.80) icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable

--- craig.ringer ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1999ms

All details were fixed:
- rebased to recent GIT
- updated regression test for max_prepared_transactions=0
- tested on Windows (by Hari Babu, thanks!)

Why is this patch still in "Waiting on Author" state in the CF app?

Thanks in advance,
Zoltán Böszörményi

--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
     http://www.postgresql.at/



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to