On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > IMO the way to resolve that conflict is with a behaviour parameter to > allow people to choose, rather than be forced to wait a year because > some people still run an old version of an add-on package. A good way > to do that would be to have a sql_standard = postgres | 2011 etc so we > can tick the box in having a sql standard flagger as well.
The undesirability of syntax-altering GUCs has been discussed here on many occasions. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers