Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I think if we backpatch this we should only prefer wraparound tables and
> leave the rest unchanged.
That's not a realistic option, at least not with anything that uses this
approach to sorting the tables. You'd have to assume that qsort() is
stable which it probably isn't.
> I don't think the argument that the pg_class order might work better
> than anything holds that much truth - its not like thats something
> really stable.
I find that less than credible as well.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
