On 24/01/13 07:45, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund escribió:I somewhat dislike the fact that CONCURRENTLY isn't really concurrent here (for the listeners: swapping the indexes acquires exlusive locks) , but I don't see any other naming being better.REINDEX ALMOST CONCURRENTLY?
REINDEX BEST EFFORT CONCURRENTLY? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
