Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > This patch seems to do the right thing.
Hmm ... seems kinda grotty ... isn't there a cleaner way?
> It probably needs to be applied to all the live branches.
Agreed on back-patching once we have the right thing, but I don't like
this version too much.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
