On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On 21 Aug 2002, Rod Taylor wrote: > > > > > Agreed. If patches are applied to the 7.4 branch as fast as normal, > > > then maybe 7.4 will only be 6 months out with well tested Windows, PIT, > > > etc. code that gets applied this October. > > > > > > Whats the intended branchpoint? Beta with less than 5 patches? 3rd > > > beta start period? Less than 100 lines changed between betas? > > > > Actually, I believe the agreement on branchpoint for this release was > > release date ... with the normal having been a few weeks *after* release > > in previous releases ... > > Actually, you proposed beta2 as the branch time for this release, and no > one objected. I think we will have to be flexible and see how heavy the > patching is during beta, but I think the latest would be on release > date. Our releases are very solid now, so we have very little patching > after release, and now that I and Tom are fulltime, we can handle the > load of double-patching better.
Oh, even better :) I didn't think I had succeeded in getting it brought *that* far forward :) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])