On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 15:02, Tom Lane wrote: > Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > olly=# drop schema testing; > > NOTICE: table testing.testa depends on schema testing > > ERROR: Cannot drop schema testing because other objects depend on it > > Use DROP ... CASCADE to drop the dependent objects too > > > This seems a little over-restrictive to me. > > It's per spec: SQL92 saith ... > Also, it seems the safest behavior to me. "rmdir dir" won't remove a > nonempty directory; isn't that a pretty close analogy?
Not really, seeing that you can't say "mkdir directory (containing these files)". An implicit cascade *inside* the schema seems an appropriate parallel to "CREATE SCHEMA ... (CREATE TABLE ...)". After all, we don't have to say "DROP TABLE ... CASCADE" because the table has rows in it! But if that's what the spec says... -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C ======================================== "For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God; and the dead in Christ shall rise first; Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air; and so shall we ever be with the Lord." I Thessalonians 4:16,17 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
