On 1/7/2013 1:10 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 7 January 2013 07:29, Takeshi Yamamuro
<yamamuro.take...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>Anyway, the compression speed in lz4 is very fast, so in my
>opinion, there is a room to improve the current implementation
>in pg_lzcompress.
So why don't we use LZ4?
what will changing compression formats do for compatability?
this is for the compressed data in pg_toast storage or something? will
this break pg_upgrade style operations?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
