On 02.10.2012 21:20, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Simon Riggs<si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
but its not high on my radar
right now unless you can explain why it should be higher.
It may not be high, but I'm just worried that we are likely to forget to
apply that change into HEAD if we postpone it furthermore.
Ping? I haven't been paying much attention to this, but please commit
the 9.2 fix to HEAD. This just caused a small merge conflict when I
tried to backport (or rather, forward-port) a patch. We do more changes
to HEAD later.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
