On 24 December 2012 15:48, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 03:13:59PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: >> I don't think that represents enough change to keep people happy, but >> I don't see anything else useful being suggested in this patch. Other >> design thoughts welcome, but personally, I think rushing this design >> through at this stage is likely to require us to change the design >> again in later releases. > > Simon, you just agreed to: > >> At this point, backward compatibility seems to be hampering our ability >> to move forward. I would like a vote that supports creation of a new >> method for setting up streaming replication/point-in-time-recovery, >> where backward compatibility is considered only where it is minimally >> invasive. > > Let's figure out the API we want and implement it.
That's exactly what I spent the afternoon doing. Merry Christmas -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
