On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Tomas Vondra <t...@fuzzy.cz> wrote: > > IMHO many of the patches that are currently marked as "needs review" and > have no reviewers, were actually reviewed or are being discussed > thoroughly on the list, but this information was not propagated to the > CF page.
Should active discussion on the hackers list prevent someone from doing a review? I know I am reluctant to review a patch when it seems it is still being actively redesigned/debated by others. Maybe a new status of "needs design consensus" would be useful. Cheers, Jeff -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
